<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spectral Analysis source files</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stephan.acidcats.nl/blog/2009/03/01/spectral-analysis-source-files/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stephan.acidcats.nl/blog/2009/03/01/spectral-analysis-source-files/</link>
	<description>from the trenches of software development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:00:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stephan</title>
		<link>http://stephan.acidcats.nl/blog/2009/03/01/spectral-analysis-source-files/comment-page-1/#comment-10882</link>
		<dc:creator>stephan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephan.acidcats.nl/blog/?p=39#comment-10882</guid>
		<description>Would be good to try pitch detection yeah, especially with Flash player 10.1 coming up. I haven&#039;t had the time to delve into it, but what I do know about it is that pitch detection is basically a double FFT. Googling should get you more details on that. I suggest you start with something simpler than piano though. Piano tones are known to contain a lot of non harmonic overtones, which will give a lot of misses on the pitch detection if you use double FFT. Voice is prob a better start :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be good to try pitch detection yeah, especially with Flash player 10.1 coming up. I haven&#8217;t had the time to delve into it, but what I do know about it is that pitch detection is basically a double FFT. Googling should get you more details on that. I suggest you start with something simpler than piano though. Piano tones are known to contain a lot of non harmonic overtones, which will give a lot of misses on the pitch detection if you use double FFT. Voice is prob a better start <img src='http://stephan.acidcats.nl/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://stephan.acidcats.nl/blog/2009/03/01/spectral-analysis-source-files/comment-page-1/#comment-10881</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephan.acidcats.nl/blog/?p=39#comment-10881</guid>
		<description>hey stephan, i&#039;m pretty new to FFT and it&#039;s uses. But i&#039;m trying to figure out how to do pitch detection on simple sounds. Say for example a single piano note. maybe you could point me in the right direction? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey stephan, i&#8217;m pretty new to FFT and it&#8217;s uses. But i&#8217;m trying to figure out how to do pitch detection on simple sounds. Say for example a single piano note. maybe you could point me in the right direction? <img src='http://stephan.acidcats.nl/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: makc</title>
		<link>http://stephan.acidcats.nl/blog/2009/03/01/spectral-analysis-source-files/comment-page-1/#comment-10117</link>
		<dc:creator>makc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephan.acidcats.nl/blog/?p=39#comment-10117</guid>
		<description>damn, why didn&#039;t I find this post &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/makc3d/status/4381425518&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;earlier&lt;/a&gt;:(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>damn, why didn&#8217;t I find this post <a href="http://twitter.com/makc3d/status/4381425518" rel="nofollow">earlier</a> <img src='http://stephan.acidcats.nl/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephan</title>
		<link>http://stephan.acidcats.nl/blog/2009/03/01/spectral-analysis-source-files/comment-page-1/#comment-5737</link>
		<dc:creator>stephan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephan.acidcats.nl/blog/?p=39#comment-5737</guid>
		<description>Looks good! I don&#039;t mind you changing package &amp; class name, after all, it&#039;s your effort :) Anything to get this stuff going. Keep me posted on your performance upgrades!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good! I don&#8217;t mind you changing package &#038; class name, after all, it&#8217;s your effort <img src='http://stephan.acidcats.nl/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Anything to get this stuff going. Keep me posted on your performance upgrades!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vFragosop</title>
		<link>http://stephan.acidcats.nl/blog/2009/03/01/spectral-analysis-source-files/comment-page-1/#comment-5729</link>
		<dc:creator>vFragosop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 01:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephan.acidcats.nl/blog/?p=39#comment-5729</guid>
		<description>Hi again Stephan. I&#039;ve done some &lt;a href=&quot;http://labs.vfragosop.com/Crush.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;testings&lt;/a&gt; with your sources. With some minor upgrades it will be running really really fast.
I&#039;ve uploaded one of the tests and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://labs.vfragosop.com/Crush_sources.rar&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sources&lt;/a&gt; to share with you some ideas.

Note that I&#039;ve modified the class name and its package cause I rewrote the code to better understand how the work was done without having to overwrite your code so I could compare results.

But, since I have no intentions besides colaborate with you and learn about fft and complex functions performance, I guess there&#039;s no problem. Please, let me know if you feel uncomfortable about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi again Stephan. I&#8217;ve done some <a href="http://labs.vfragosop.com/Crush.html" rel="nofollow">testings</a> with your sources. With some minor upgrades it will be running really really fast.<br />
I&#8217;ve uploaded one of the tests and the <a href="http://labs.vfragosop.com/Crush_sources.rar" rel="nofollow">sources</a> to share with you some ideas.</p>
<p>Note that I&#8217;ve modified the class name and its package cause I rewrote the code to better understand how the work was done without having to overwrite your code so I could compare results.</p>
<p>But, since I have no intentions besides colaborate with you and learn about fft and complex functions performance, I guess there&#8217;s no problem. Please, let me know if you feel uncomfortable about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vFragosop</title>
		<link>http://stephan.acidcats.nl/blog/2009/03/01/spectral-analysis-source-files/comment-page-1/#comment-5726</link>
		<dc:creator>vFragosop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephan.acidcats.nl/blog/?p=39#comment-5726</guid>
		<description>Own!!! Nice nice news.. I&#039;ll check out the codes, and hopefully comeback with nice suggestions.. Thanks for the draft and the time spent.
I&#039;m forwarding this link for some other guys who are interested on Actionscript FFT too.
Maybe we all can help you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Own!!! Nice nice news.. I&#8217;ll check out the codes, and hopefully comeback with nice suggestions.. Thanks for the draft and the time spent.<br />
I&#8217;m forwarding this link for some other guys who are interested on Actionscript FFT too.<br />
Maybe we all can help you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

